During the interview via satellite, both mothers agreed that they are victims but the conversation was never brought to a resolution of how they could use their experience to portray the negative effects of the Occupation for both sides. Instead, the Israeli mother wanted an apology and Ayat's mother was telling her Ayat's decision was influenced by the Israeli Occupation. Ayat's operation was an act of resistance and the Israeli mother was too stubborn to look past the pain of her daughter's death to grasp that idea. I would advise the Israeli mother to use her daughter's death as a medium to protest the injustices that are happening in Palestine that provoke them to choose suicide bombings.
The opportunity the Isreali mother had to try and understand the conditions that the Palestinian people face in their homeland, the refugee camps and border checks, was wasted on useless talk about why Ayat did what she did and how can her mother condone it...and she just went on about her own sorrow. Ayat's mother was trying to tell her that the Palestinians are not blaming their problems on the occupation, the OCcupation iS the PRObLem. No matter how much Ayat's mother stressed how it feels to live under Occupation and the effects of those living conditions, the Israeli mother chose to be disrespectful and blind to the injustices that Israel is inflicting upon the Palestinian people.
The isreali mother kept repeating that violence isnt the answer and that by talking they could accomplish more, but it was evident by the end of the video that talking did not achieve anything. What is there really to talk about? Their is no legitimacy for the Occupation, it is illegal and they are violating human rights. The Palestinians are fighting for their freedom and rights back. Israel has US support and military power and with that the conversation ends.
I agree that the occupation is the problem, as you said. Rachel's mother seemed unwilling to listen to anything or anybody other than herself.
ReplyDelete